|
Researchers
Find Two New Leads For Anti-Anthrax Drugs
Description
As fears over bioterrorism attacks
spiral, researchers are making progress towards better
anthrax drugs - but these are unlikely to reach the
drugstore soon.
Of ten confirmed anthrax cases in
the United States by Monday, four have been of the severe,
inhaled form against which antibiotics often fail. By
the time drugs destroy the bacteria responsible, Bacillus
anthracis, the organisms have released enough lethal
toxin to kill immune cells in the blood, causing fatal
blood poisoning.
Two new discoveries lay the groundwork
for drugs that could disable the toxin and, along with
antibiotics, save lives.
John Young, of the University of
Wisconsin in Madison, and his colleagues have pinpointed
the protein, on the surface of human cells, which the
anthrax toxin latches onto1. In the lab a
synthetic version of this 'receptor' mops up the poison
and protects cells. "It serves as a decoy," Young explains.
Part of the toxin attaches to this
receptor, punches a hole in the human cell membrane
and injects another part, the 'lethal factor', which
destroys proteins in the cell. A second team, led by
Robert Liddington of The Burnham Institute in La Jolla,
California, have deduced the structure of this lethal
factor2.
With a picture of how the toxin's
proteins attack cells, drug companies can search for
chemicals that block their activity, the teams hope.
This promise is unlikely to be realized
in time to help the current situation, Young and Liddington
caution - most optimistic estimates are that improvements
will be a year in the making. "We need to design drugs
- not for this time round but for the next one," says
Liddington.
Alternative
medicine
The current crisis gives the hunt
for effective treatments new urgency. What we have is
no longer "state-of-the-art", says Richard Corlin, director
of the American Medical Association in Chicago, Illinois.
The latest work "will lead us to a better treatment",
he agrees.
Excessive use of an existing antibiotic,
ciprofloxacin, could create its own medical problems,
Corlin warns. The drug destroys healthy bacteria in
the body, so may leave people open to infection from
other pathogens.
Overuse of antibiotics and failure
to complete the 60-day course virtually "guarantee the
emergence of antibiotic resistant strains" of these
pathogenic bacteria, he says, making such infections
difficult to treat.
Bioterrorists could potentially
engineer antibiotic-resistant anthrax. Manufacturing
bacteria able to withstand toxin-targeted drugs would
be "almost impossible", says John Collier of Harvard
Medical School, who contributed to both studies. It
would require expert biochemical knowledge to alter
specific protein shapes and interactions.
The anthrax vaccine is also problematic.
Developed in the 1960s, it involves injecting a crude
mix of the toxin's protein components to stimulate resistance.
Vaccination requires six shots and regular boosters.
The vaccine is currently produced only in sufficient
quantities for the US military.
Several groups are designing more
effective versions using purified proteins, explains
anthrax researcher Stephen Leppla of the National Institute
of Dental and Craniofacial Reseach in Bethesda, Maryland.
These are easily administered and produce long-lasting
immunity. "Before too long, we'll have it," he predicts.
Ultimately, we need a whole new
arsenal to fight anthrax, says Collier - a new antibiotic,
a safe, efficient vaccine, and drugs against toxins.
Realizing this goal requires further funding for research
and fast-track approval of candidate drugs, he suggests.
Meanwhile most people agree that
heightened awareness remains the best form of defence,
catching early, cold-like symptoms in time for the disease
to be treated. "The key thing is an appropriate degree
of surveillance," says Corbin.
Spore
show
Anthrax spores, the persistent,
dormant form of the bacterium, can cause infection through
the skin and intestine, but inhalation is the most dangerous
- around 90% of cases result in death.
Turning anthrax into an effective
bioweapon is technically difficult - spores must be
milled down into a very fine powder (less than 5 micrometres
in diameter) for them to reach the depths of the lungs
in sufficient quantities to cause infection. A dose
of around 10,000 spores is thought to cause a lethal
infection.
Source:
Nature Science Update, October 2001

|