| Faecal
Signs
Tiger faeces
give an estimate of its population
researchers from Bengaluru extracted dna
from tigers faeces to estimate their population. Not
only did it turn out to be as accurate as the camera trap
method, it also provided information on the animals
genetic diversity.
Faeces were collected in Bandipur National
Park in Karnataka and analyzed for dna. The population estimate
was 62 tigers. This was compared with earlier estimates made
using camera traps. The two were identical, indicating that
the faecal dna method was as accurate as camera traps.
For the faecal method, one needs to identify
markers on the dna strand.
These markers are unique to each tiger. Since tigers have
a low genetic diversity five markers in the dna strand of
one tiger were enough for Bandipur, said the team. The
chances of making a mistake with five markers are once in
200 times, which is okay given the tiger population is definitely
less than 100, said Uma Ramakrishnan, one of the authors.
In case of the camera trap methodology,
there are possibilities of camera thefts and difficulty in
capturing inaccessible terrains. Moreover, it is used for
animals which can be counted using distinguishing marks; stripe
patterns are unique to each tiger. This is where genetic sampling
gets an edge over camera traps, said the study published in
the June 17 issue of Biological Conservation. It can be used
for species which dont have distinguishing marks between
individuals. This method is also cheaper than using camera
trapsRs 11,095 per animal identified through camera
versus Rs 7,413 for dna analyses.
Before camera traps, the standard
method followed by wildlife researchers was counting pugmarks.
The 2008 census using this method found 80 tigers in Bandipur.
Source: Down
To Earth,
Date:
August, 2009

|