Tsunami
Alerts Must be Tailored to People, Says Report
The Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning System
(IOTWS), established after the devastating tsunami of December
2004, will fail unless attention is paid to how local governments
and people respond to such warnings, says a report.
The study, conducted by the Stockholm Environment Institute
in Indonesia, Sri Lanka and Thailand in 2009 and published
this month (11 January), found that there is an "overwhelming
emphasis on technocratic approaches" within the system,
set up by UNESCO's Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission
in 2005.
Two of the three phases of the early warning process
forecasting and disseminating warnings have been well
financed, said the report. But the third dimension, research
into how people respond and how warnings can be tailored,
has received little attention.
And there is "a lack of political will among some local
leaders to engage in community-based disaster risk reduction
activities", wrote the authors.
Dr Fauzi, director of the Earthquake and Tsunami Center of
Indonesia's Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics Agency
(BMKG), agreed with the findings, telling SciDev.Net that
"while the system and tools are reliable, people, institutions
and infrastructure in the field have yet to be compatible
with it".
The system relies on seismographic sensors, which detect
the seabed tremors and tiny changes in water pressure that
warn of a tsunami, installed in a network of buoys across
the Indian Ocean.
Seismologists at centres in Japan and Hawaii monitor the
technology and send out a warning to 26 national centres in
the region. This is then relayed to local authorities who
forward the message to communities using telephones, sirens,
radio and television.
Patra Rina Dewi, director of the Tsunami Alert Community
(Kogami), a nongovernmental organisation working on disaster
mitigation training for communities, said the knowledge people
most need is whether an earthquake has the potential to become
a tsunami.
The current standard for this is an earthquake that occurs
less than ten kilometres below the seafloor and is recorded
as more than seven on the Richter scale.
"But this kind of information should be translated into
easy information for the people," said Patra.
She added that the most effective warning method is sirens,
but these are often of limited number and can be heard only
at a distance of about one kilometre.
And some technology is now defunct because of vandalism and
theft.
In Indonesia, 11 of the 20 installed buoys have been vandalised
or stolen, according to Ridwan Djamaluddin, programme director
of Indonesia's Agency for Assessment and Application of Technology.
"And the remaining nine do not work in full due to weather
constraints and technical problems."
Source: SciDev Net
Date: 25 January, 2010

|