Industrial
Promotion Policies - Central Government
National Steel
Policy - 2005
Objective
1.1 Strategic Goal: The long-term
goal of the national steel policy is that India should
have a modern and efficient steel industry of world
standards, catering to diversified steel demand. The
focus of the policy would therefore be to achieve global
competitiveness not only in terms of cost, quality and
product-mix but also in terms of global benchmarks of
efficiency and productivity. This will require indigenous
production of over 100 million tonnes (mT) per annum
by 2019-20 from the 2004-05 level of 38 mT. This implies
a compounded annual growth of 7.3 percent per annum.
1.2 The above strategic goal is justified on the ground that steel consumption
in the world, around 1000 mT in 2004, is expected to
grow at 3.0 percent per annum 1 to reach 1,395 mT in
2015, compared to 2 percent per annum in the past fifteen
years. China will continue to have a dominant share
of the world steel demand. At home, the Indian growth
rate of steel production over the past fifteen years
was 7.0 percent per annum. The projected growth rate
of 7.3 percent per annum in India compares well with
the projected national income growth rate of 7-8 percent
per annum, given an income elasticity of steel consumption
of around 1.
1.3 In terms of consumption of steel, defined as production plus imports minus
exports, the present equation is 38+2-4 = 36 mT in 2004-05.
Table 1 gives the equation for 2019-20 and the projected
compounded annual growth rates for production, imports,
exports and consumption.
Table 1: Production, Imports, Exports and Consumption of Steel
(in million tonnes)
Production
Imports
Exports
Consumption
2019-20
110
6
26
90
2004-05
38
2
4
36
CAGR*
7.3%
7.1%
13.3 %
6.9 %
Notes: * Compounded Annual Growth Rate
2. Industry Structure
2.1 The iron and steel industry in India is organized in three categories’
viz. main producers, other major producers and the secondary
producers. The main producers and other major producers
have integrated steel making facility with plant capacities
over 0.5 mT and utilize iron ore and coal/gas for production
of steel. In 2004-05, the main producers i.e. SAIL,
TISCO and RINL had a combined capacity of around 19.3
mT and capacity utilization was 104percent.
The other major producers comprising of ESSAR, ISPAT
and JVSL had a capacity of 6.4 mT with capacity utilization
of 97 percent. The secondary sector is dispersed and
consists of:
(a) Backward linkage from about 120 sponge iron producers that use iron ore
and non-coking coal, with a capacity of around 13 mT,
providing feedstock for steel producers. The capacity
utilization in 2004-05 was 75 percent.
(b) About 650 mini blast furnaces, electric arc furnaces, induction furnaces
and energy optimizing furnaces that use iron ore, sponge
iron and melting scrap to produce steel. Their capacity
is around 14.7 mT, and capacity utilization in 2004-05
was 58 percent.
(c) Forward linkage with about 1,200 re-rollers that roll out semis into finished
steel products for consumer use. These are small and
medium enterprises, whose reported capacity is around
15 mT, and capacity utilization in 2004-05 was 55 percent.
3. Swot Analysis of the Industry
3.1 The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats for the Indian steel
industry have been tabulated below. The national steel
policy lays down the broad roadmap to deal with all
of them.
Strengths
1. Availability of iron ore and coal
2. Low labour wage rates
3. Abundance of quality manpower
4. Mature production base
4.1 A multi-pronged strategy would be adopted to move towards the long-term policy
goal. On the demand side, the strategy would be to
create incremental demand through promotional efforts,
creation of awareness and strengthening the delivery
chain, particularly in rural areas. On the supply
side, the strategy would be to facilitate creation
of additional capacity, remove procedural and policy
bottlenecks in the availability of inputs such as
iron ore and coal, make higher investments in R&D
and HRD and encourage the creation of infrastructure
such as roads, railways, and ports.
5. Steel Demand
5.1 Urban Areas: The present steel consumption per capita per annum is
about 30 kg in India, compared to 150 kg in the world,
and 350 kg in the developed world. The estimated urban consumption per capita
per annum is around 77 kg in the country, expected
to reach approximately 165 kg in 2019-20, implying
a CAGR of 5 percent. Apart from the anticipated growth
in the construction, automobile, oil and gas transportation,
and infrastructure sectors of the economy, conscious
promotion of steel usage among architects, engineers
and students by the Institute of Steel Development
and Growth (INSDAG) and the large producers will drive
this additional consumption. Steps would be taken
to encourage usage of steel in bridges, crash barriers,
flyovers and building construction. Benefits of steel
usage would be added to the technical education curricula
in the country.
5.2 Rural Areas: The rural consumption of steel in India remains at around
2 kg per capita per annum, primarily because steel
is perceived to be expensive among the village folks.
Based on the promotional efforts mentioned above,
and an active focus on opening new block level rural
stock points, a target is set for raising the per
capita rural consumption of steel to 4 kg per annum
by 2019-20, implying a CAGR of 4.4 percent.
5.3 Exports: Although the focus of Indian steel industry is on the domestic
market, export will be another window on the demand
side. The growth of exports of steel from India has
been around 10 percent per annum over the past decade.
That speaks for the international cost competitiveness
of the steel sector. It takes assiduous effort to
create, and hold on to export markets. While the business
decision to export will depend on the prevailing relative
prices, the Government would encourage strategic alliances
with buyback arrangements and dedicated export production
through 100% export-oriented units. A growth rate
of around 13 percent per annum is envisaged up to
2019-20. The issues related to exports have been discussed
in section 13 on Trade Policy.
6.1 While the country has rich endowments of iron ore and non-coking coal, and
has cheap labour, this advantage is neutralized considerably
by low material and energy efficiency, poor quality,
poor productivity, and high cost of coking coal, power,
freight and finance. The policy for making the critical
inputs available to the industry is outlined in the
following paragraphs.
6.2 Critical Inputs: In order to support steel production of 110 mT by
2019-20, at 100 percent capacity utilization, the
required quantities of critical inputs such as iron
ore, coking and non-coking coal can be seen in Table
2 below. The projected requirements are based on the
assumption that new capacities will be 60 percent
through the Blast Furnace (BF) route, 33 percent through
the Sponge Iron – Electric Arc Furnace (EAF)
route and 7 percent through other routes.
Table 2: Critical Inputs for Steel Production
(in million tonnes)
Iron Ore
Coking Coal
Non-Coking Coal
2019-20
190
70
26
2004-05
54
27
13
6.2.1.1 Iron ore: At present, the in-situ reserves of relatively rich
iron ore in India are 11.43 billion tonnes of haematite
and 10.68billion tonnes of magnetite ores.
Though the reserves of haematite ore appear to be
large, high-grade lumpy reserves constitute only 8.7
percent of the total. Further, the present commercial
mining capacity for iron ore is only 175 mT . Production
of iron ore in 2004-05was 145 mT, of which
54 mT was domestically consumed and 78 mT was exported.
Of the 600 mining leases, only 246 were operated in
2003-04.
6.2.1.2 In order to ensure availability of 190 mT of iron ore for domestic production
of steel by 2019-20, Government would encourage investments
in creation of an additional modern mining and beneficiation
capacity of 200 mT. The size of these investments
will be around Rs. 20,000 crore. The current policy
of captive mining leases for the private sector would
continue, but it is necessary that investment plans
be put in place for idle mining leases. State governments
would recommend renewal of existing leases only against
credible mining investment plans in a specified period.
The Government would lay down priorities and guidelines
for the State governments to recommend fresh mining
leases, having regard to the entrepreneur’s
mining investment plans, and technical and financial
capabilities. Environmental and forest clearances
would be granted within a pre-specified time frame.
Though local value addition would be given priority,
the Government would encourage iron ore trading in
order to make this essential raw material available
to the iron and steel industry throughout the country.
The Government would encourage investments in adding
value to iron ore fines. Scientific mining and economies
of scale would also be encouraged through consortia
of small users and by prescribing a minimum economic
size for mines.
6.2.2 Exports of iron ore: After remaining stagnant at around 35 mT for
about a decade (between 1991-92 to 1999-2000), exports
of iron ore from India have grown in the last 4 years
to 78 mT in 2004-05 on the back of large exports of
iron ore fines to China. Fines and concentrates, which
have little use in India except as a negative environmental
externality, make up about 90 percent of Indian iron
ore exports currently. As investments are made into
beneficiation, sintering and pelletization in the
country, which will use these fines, the growth in
exports of iron ore is likely to decline. Exports
have thus been estimated to be around 100 mT by 2019-20.
In terms of future policy, exports of iron ore, especially
high-grade lumps, would be leveraged for imports of
coking coal or for investment in India. Long-term
export supply of iron ore would be confined to a maximum
of five-year contracts. This duration would be reviewed
from time to time. A judicious balance would continue
to be maintained between exports and domestic supply
of iron ore.
6.2.3.1 Coking coal: The proven reserves of prime coking coal are only
4.6 billion tonnes. The quality of Indian coking coal
is also not suitable for steel. The production of
coal during 2001-02 was 328 mT, out of which
coking coal amounted to only 29 mT. The low ash coking
coals required by steel makers was around 10 mT in
2001-02. Coking coal production has declined at an
annual rate of 4.7 percent during the decade ending
2001-02.
6.2.3.2 Poor quality domestic prime coking coal has to be blended with imported
coal. Currently the steel industry imports around
19 mT of coking coal annually, and procures 7.5 mT
from indigenous sources including captive mines. By
2019-20, about70 mT of coking coal will be
required, of which 85 percent will have to be imported.
6.2.3.3 The imperatives of coking coal security require that new sources of coking
coal be tapped. Accordingly, the Government would
aim for the coal sector to become market-driven, but
in the meantime continue allocation of captive coking
coal blocks to steel plants, and establish mechanisms
to share their surplus resource with other steel plants.
The Government would encourage joint ventures and
equity participation abroad by steel and coal companies.
Simultaneously, efforts would be made to develop and
adapt technologies, which have synergy with the natural
resource base (non-coking coal) of the country. The
steel industry would be encouraged to make investments
in washing and beneficiation of coal.
6.2.4 Non-Coking Coal: With proven reserves of 74 billion tonnes, non-coking
coal constitutes around 82 percent of the total coal
reserves in India. Production of non-coking coal at
294 mT during 2001-02 was 91 percent of the total
coal production of 328 mT. In 2004-05, the steel sector
consumed about 8 mTof non-coking coal, excluding
thermal coal for captive power plants.
6.2.5.1 Sponge iron grade non-coking coal: The sponge iron industry using
non-coking coal as input material will play an important
role in future as a substitute input for coke. The
capacity of sponge iron industry would increase from
the current 13 mT to 20 mT by the end of 2010-11,
at a growth rate of 6.5 percent per annum, and thereafter,
till 2020, grow to 38 mT. The current trends indicate
that a large number of sponge iron based steel units
may come up in the states of Orissa and Jharkhand.
By 2019-20 the steel industry will demand around 26
mT of non-coking coalof higher grades.
6.2.5.2 Available data show a declining rate of growth in production of non-coking
coal in India. In the decade of 1980s, the growth
rate was 6.5 percent, which fell to 3.9 percent in
the 1990s. In the last five years the growth rate
has been 4.7 percent. The power plants are, therefore,
planning to import large quantities of thermal coal.
Further, Indian coal is high in ash content, which
will force non-coking coal based steel production
also to go for some imports.
6.2.5.3 While market forces should allocate resources to their most efficient
uses, which would require the coal sector to be deregulated,
a strategy for the transitional period would be needed.
Accordingly, the sponge iron and steel industry would
get first priority in the allocation of higher grades
of non-coking coal of below 12 percent ash content,
being essential feedstock. Greater flexibilities would
be introduced in the form of sale of surplus coal,
re-allocation of existing unused linkages with Coal
India Limited, and allocation to consortia of small
users. Joint ventures of public sector companies with
the private sector would be explored in order to finance
the required investments.
6.2.6.1 Natural Gas: The pricing mechanism for natural gas, taking into
account the cyclical nature of the steel industry,
needs to move gradually towards market-determined
prices. It would also be desirable to put in place
the regulatory framework, as natural gas stocks are
limited in the country and sufficient level of competition
has to be ensured in this sector. Further the industry
needs time for adjustment as price shocks lead to
loss of business confidence.
6.2.6.2 Considering the importance of gas based steel plants due to (a) environmental
cleanliness, (b) shortages of coking coal required
for other major routes, and (c) natural gas being
a feedstock for sponge iron plants and not just a
heating source, the present system of allocation and
pricing of natural gas to the steel sector would remain
under continual review.
6.2.7 Refractories:Refractories are used to line various high temperature
vessels used in the steel manufacturing process. India
has a refractory industry of 80 units with 1.6 mT
capacity, and utilization of just 55 percent in 2004-05.
It needs modernizing and upgrading. The Government
would foster closer technical interaction between
the steel industry and the refractory industry so
as to achieve fewer breakdowns, reduced down time
and prompt hot repairs. The Government would also
support basic and applied research in utilizing indigenous
refractory raw materials through partnerships between
steel and refractory producers.
7.1 Inland transportation: It is estimated that every tonne of steel production
involves transportation of 4 tonnes of material. The
envisaged addition of 75 mT of steel annually implies
300 mT of additional traffic. In a globally integrated
economy, minimization of the overall cost of transportation
becomes an important instrument of maintaining the
competitive edge in both the domestic and overseas
markets.
7.2 Table 3 below shows the year-on-year growth in gross capital formation for
‘Railways’ and ‘Transportation by
other means’.
Table 3: GCF in Transport Related Infrastructure
(Rs. Crore)
1997-98
1998-99
1999-00
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
Railways
5069
5019
(-0.99)
5307
(5.7)
5491
(3.5)
6981
(27.1)
8860
(26.9)
11609
(31.0)
Transport by other means
16460
18153
(10.3)
21272
(17.2)
25802
(21.3)
21117
(-18.2)
16476
(-22.0)
29872
(81.3)
Note: Figures in parentheses indicate year-on-year variation.
Source: National Accounts Statistics- 2004-05.
7.3.1 Railways: The railways transport iron ore and coal from mines and
ports to the plants, and steel to ports and consuming
areas. However, over the last decade railways has
been consistently losing traffic originating in the
steel sector to the roads. The share of railways in
transporting finished steel has declined from 71.9
percent in 1991-92 to 34.4 percent in 2001-02. The
decline has been largely on account of railway’s
competitive weakness in the face of challenges from
other modes of transport like roads, pipeline and
coastal shipping. Replacement of the ‘equalized
railway freight’ by ‘freight ceilings’
is also partly responsible for the modal switch.
7.3.2 On the basis of the present share of railways and roads in the movement
of raw materials and finished/saleable steel, the
expected scenario by 2019-20 appears to be as follows:
Table 4: Modal Distribution of Traffic, 2004-05 and 2019-20
Expected traffic originating in the steel sector to be handled by the railways
(mT)
2004-05
2019-20
Railways
Road
Railways
Road
Raw Materials*
80
34
230
100
Finished Steel
11
27
33
77
Total
91
61
263
177
* Excludes traffic due to export of iron ore.
7.3.3 Based on the average lead distance over which the freight needs to be computed
for raw materials for steel making and finished products,
it is estimated that the total traffic generated for
railways originating due to the iron and steel industry
would be around 120 billion tonne kilometer by 2020.
The total traffic for railways including export of
iron ore will be around 150 billion tonne kilometer.
This estimate, however, may change somewhat depending
on the exact location of the new (green-field) plants
and mines coming up in the next two decades.
7.3.4 The Railway facilities, therefore, would need to be expanded substantially
in view of the renewed investor interests in the creation
of additional steel capacities – both in green-field
and brown-field projects. The outlay for railways
as a percentage of total plan outlay has come down
from 10.3 percent (up to 4th Plan) to 6.8
percent (10th Plan). Resource constraints
may necessitate participation by the steel industry
in the creation of railway infrastructure, especially
in the capital-intensive areas of laying tracks and
procuring wagons. Besides ensuring availability, the
railways would also need to re-examine their freight
structure and improve quality of services. Dedicated
freight trains in the private sector would be encouraged.
7.4.1 Roads: Similarly, the existing road network needs to be expanded
and strengthened considerably for reducing the transaction
costs of the Indian producers. The steel plants and
mines need to be integrated with the on-going programmes
of national highway development and also with the
proposed rural road schemes for expanding the delivery
chain of steel across the country, especially the
rural areas.
7.4.2 Geographical coverage of the country by road transportation remains woefully
low despite the quantum jump in construction of roadways
across India in the recent years. Performance of the
Indian road sector is poor in terms of effective sustained
velocity of movement. This is demonstrated by the
fact that roads now carry an overwhelming 85 percent
of passenger traffic and 70 percent of freight, and
that highways account for around 40 percent of this
movement while making up only 2 percent of the overall
road network. The steel industry would be encouraged
to create links to the nearest available highways.
But the task of expanding the highway network would
continue through public-private partnerships.
7.5.1 Ports: After liberalization of the economy, the Indian steel industry
has become highly dependent on port infrastructure
both in terms of imports of critical input materials
like coal and coke and export of saleable steel. Keeping
in view the strategic goal of achieving a production
of 110 mT of steel per annum and an annual export
level of 26 mT by 2019-2020, the port facilities would
also have to be expanded substantially. The projected
bulk to be handled at ports is shown below:
Table 5: Growth in Port Traffic, 2004-05 to 2019-20
Bulk to be handled at ports (mT)
2004-05
2019-20
CAGR
Import
Export
Total
Import
Export
Total
Raw Materials*
19.3
78
97.3
85
100
185
4.4%
Steel
2
4
6
6
26
32
11.8%
Total
21.3
82
103.3
91
126
217
5.1%
*Including iron ore.
7.5.2 The current Government policy allows private capital in port development.
Steel producers would be encouraged to develop port
and berth facilities so as to improve productivity,
turn around time, capacity to handle larger vessels
and other operational parameters of efficiency.
7.6 Power: The additional requirement of power for the steel industry
would be 7,000 MW by 2019-20, requiring an additional
investment of Rs. 24,500 crore. The Electricity Act,
2003 and the National Electricity Policy allow captive
generation of power and trading of surplus power.
This will facilitate growth of investment in captive
power plants by the steel industry. At the same time
the Government would encourage the industry, and the
secondary sector in particular, to bring down the
specific consumption of power.
7.7.1 Financial Resources: In order to achieve the strategic goal of 110
mT of steel production by 2019-20, the industry would
need additional capital to the tune of Rs. 230,000
crore. In addition, funds would be required for technological
upgrade of existing facilities. However, the outstanding
advances of the banking sector to the industry at
the end of 2003-04 were only Rs. 26,295 crore. The
cost of capital in India is among the highest as shown
in Table 6.
Table 6: Cost of Capital (% per annum)
Japan
USA
Germany
China
S. Korea
Brazil
India
World
1.4
4.1
4.2
5-6
6
9.75
11
5
Source: World Bank Report, 2004
7.7.2 To mobilize such vast resources, direct foreign investment would be encouraged.
In addition the external commercial borrowing norms
would be reviewed periodically to facilitate smooth
inflows of debt, and to bring down the cost of capital.
Steel is one of the six sectors that figure in the
index of industrial production for “infrastructure,”
but the fiscal incentives available to the infrastructure
projects are not available to the steel industry.
Suitable incentives would therefore be devised for
the steel industry.
8.1 Following de-regulation of prices for integrated steel plants in 1991-92,
the domestic prices of steel have become market-determined.
Market prices remain in step with international prices,
though generally lower. During industry downturns,
prices fall and during upturns, they rise. While rationalization
of the customs and excise duty structure is aimed
primarily at reducing fiscal and revenue deficits,
it has an indirect influence on consumer prices. At
present, there are around three thousand units manufacturing
steel and steel products, which are marketed by over
100,000 traders for ultimate consumers. This dispersal
of the distribution chain has been the principal reason
why no price regulation of the steel trade has ever
been in force. Government has recently set up a Competition
Commission to look into complaints of monopolistic
pricing.
8.2 Steel futures: The cyclical nature of the steel industry deters fresh
investments due to risks of recession. The mismatch
between demand and supply also leads to price volatility
witnessed during recent times. Stagnation in steel
prices for long periods followed by sudden spurt also
affects the consumers and the infrastructure industry.
Therefore, the efforts of various stakeholders to
develop risk-hedging instruments like futures and
derivatives would be supported.
9. Human Resources
9.1 The anticipated steel production of 110 mT by 2020 would require an additional
workforce of 220,000 after accounting for the expected
productivity improvements. Further the creation of 1 man-year of employment
in the steel industry generates an additional 3.5
man-years of employment elsewhere in the economy due
to its strong linkages with other sectors such as
transport, mining, construction, machinery, and steel
fabrication. The total additional employment generated
in the economy due to expected production of 110 mT
by 2020 would be around 1 million.
9.2 The profile of the required human resources will have a larger share of the
skilled and semi-skilled labour force. It is a matter
of concern that availability of scientists, engineers
and technicians per thousand of population in India
is 7.05 compared to 113 in Japan, 90 in U.K., 53 in
Korea, 54 in Australia and 85 in Germany. Further, the task is not limited to increase
in the stock of technical manpower. The technical
and professional institutes of the country would also
be required to impart new competencies and capabilities
in tune with changes in technology and the needs of
globalization. The existing training and research
institutes under the Ministry of Steel would be brought
under an umbrella organization with representation
from each segment of the industry. The functions of
this organization would include (a) suitable training
programmes especially for the secondary small scale
units, (b) promotion of steel consumption through
dissemination of information on availability and suitability
of steel for various applications, and (c) collection
and analysis of data on important parameters of the
industry.
10. Technologies, Research And Development
10.1 Though the choice of technology will be determined by entrepreneurs based
on techno-economic considerations, the Government
would encourage adoption of technologies, which:
Have synergy with the natural resource endowments of the country.
Are conducive to production of high-end and special steel required for sophisticated
industrial and scientific applications.
Minimize damage to the environment at various stages of steel making and mining.
Optimize resource utilization.
Facilitate modernization of the steel industry so as to achieve global standards
of productivity and efficiency.
Development of front end and strategic steel based materials.
10.2 India’s expenditure on Research and Development has been negligible
not only in absolute terms but also as a percentage
of GNP at 0.86 percent. This can be compared to the
developed world with an average ratio of 2.5 percent. In the case of steel industry, the ratio of expenditure
on R&D as a percentage of turnover is only 0.26 percent.
10.3 The low priority to indigenous R&D has given rise to adoption of technologies
that are more suited to conditions prevailing in the
developed world. For example, resource position of
raw materials requires development of technologies,
which can use indigenous coking coals and non-coking
coals and for improvement in quality of high alumina
Indian iron ore. But lack of innovation and adaptation
to Indian conditions is resulting in large-scale import
of coking coal and low performance in iron making.
Aggressive R&D efforts would, therefore, be mounted
to create manufacturing capability for special types
of steel, substitute coking coal, enrichment and agglomeration
of iron ore fines, develop new products suited to
rural needs, enhance material and energy efficiency,
utilize waste, and arrest environmental degradation.
Public sector steel companies would enhance R&D expenditure
in the coming years to finance internal R&D efforts
and sponsor outside research, which may provide a
framework for inter-disciplinary cooperation with
the private sector across national boundaries. Government’s
contribution to fostering basic and applied R&D will
be enhanced.
11.1 With a view to making various operations in steel industry environment friendly,
environmental audit and life cycle assessment of existing
steel plants (including sponge iron units) would be
encouraged so that the relevant processes reduce emissions
and effluents, minimize and better manage solid waste
generation, and improve resource conservation such
as energy and water. There are some fine examples
of high-level environmental performance in the steel
sector already. However, the steel sector would join
the efforts of other industries to improve environmental
performance even more. The secondary steel producers
would be proactively assisted in shifting to processes
that are more environment-protective. A similar policy
would be followed in assisting natural resource industries,
such as iron ore and coal mining, where scientific
mining and mineral processing would be encouraged.
12. Secondary And Small Scale Sector
12.1 The secondary sector primarily consists of non-integrated and comparatively
small steel producers. However there are large variations
amongst various units in terms of scale of operations,
product-mix and technology. The secondary sector plays
an important role in providing employment, meeting
local demand of steel in rural and semi-urban areas,
and meeting the country’s demand of some special
products required in small volumes.
12.2 The Government will strive to provide the necessary feedstock to these units
at reasonable prices from major plants through the
existing mechanism of State Small Industries Corporations.
13. Trade Policy
13.1 Exports: It is estimated that the country will achieve an export
ratio of around 25 percent of the total production
in 2019-20 from 11 percent in 2004-05. This is comparable
with a 30 percent share of exports in global production.
The Government will support all efforts to make available
export credit, provide trade information, and cut
transaction costs in general. In view of the slow
progress of multi-lateral negotiations, Government
would focus on regional trade agreements to broaden
the export base. Exports of value-added steel and
steel products, including indirect export of steel
through project exports, would be encouraged.
13.2 Imports: Import duty rates have been brought down progressively in
the post-deregulation period. The Indian steel industry
has been able to successfully withstand the competitive
pressures of overseas producers. However, integration
with the global economy requires that the industry
should be protected from unfair trade practices, which
become common especially during the periods of downturn.
The Government would, therefore, institute mechanisms
for import surveillance, and monitor export subsidies
in other countries.
14. Investment Promotions and Policy Implementation
14.1 The very nature of steel production, especially through the integrated route,
requires a number of clearances of the central and
state governments for investment in the steel sector.
Delays at various levels not only add to project costs
but also discourage fresh investments. Hence a suitable
executing mechanism will be evolved to discharge the
following functions:
Provide a single-window clearance for large projects,
to be followed by statutory clearances by the concerned
ministries.
Prepare and implement an action plan for achieving
the strategic goal of 110 mT of steel production by
2019-20, with separate plans for the growth of flats
and long products.
Prepare and implement road maps for technological and productivity improvements
benchmarking them to global standards.
Monitor the implementation of the National Steel Policy.
Conduct reviews to remove infrastructural, procedural
and institutional bottlenecks and to achieve policy
coordination among central Ministries and State Governments.