Industrial
Promotion Policies - Central Government
National
Health Policy - 2002
Introductory
1.1 A National Health Policy was last
formulated in 1983, and since then there have been marked
changes in the determinant factors relating to the health
sector. Some of the policy initiatives outlined in the
NHP-1983 have yielded results, while, in several other
areas, the outcome has not been as expected.
1.2 The NHP-1983 gave a general exposition
of the policies which required recommendation in the
circumstances then prevailing in the health sector.
The noteworthy initiatives under that policy were:-
(i) A phased, time-bound programme
for setting up a well-dispersed network of comprehensive
primary health care services, linked with extension
and health education, designed in the context of the
ground reality that elementary health problems can be
resolved by the people themselves;
(ii) Intermediation through 'Health
volunteers' having appropriate knowledge, simple skills
and requisite technologies;
(iii) Establishment of a well-worked
out referral system to ensure that patient load at the
higher levels of the hierarchy is not needlessly burdened
by those who can be treated at the decentralized level;
(iv) An integrated net-work of evenly
spread speciality and super-speciality services; encouragement
of such facilities through private investments for patients
who can pay, so that the draw on the Government's facilities
is limited to those entitled to free use.
1.3 Government initiatives in the
pubic health sector have recorded some noteworthy successes
over time. Smallpox and Guinea Worm Disease have been
eradicated from the country; Polio is on the verge of
being eradicated; Leprosy, Kala Azar, and Filariasis
can be expected to be eliminated in the foreseeable
future. There has been a substantial drop in the Total
Fertility Rate and Infant Mortality Rate. The success
of the initiatives taken in the public health field
are reflected in the progressive improvement of many
demographic / epidemiological / infrastructural indicators
over time - (Box-I).
Box-1 : Achievements Through The
Years - 1951-2000
Indicator
1951
1981
2000
Demographic
Changes
Life Expectancy
36.7
54
64.6(RGI)
Crude
Birth Rate
40.8
33.9(SRS)
26.1(99
SRS)
Crude
Death Rate
25
12.5(SRS)
8.7(99
SRS)
IMR
146
110
70 (99
SRS)
Epidemiological
Shifts
Malaria
(cases in million)
75
2.7
2.2
Leprosy
cases per 10,000 population
38.1
57.3
3.74
Small
Pox (no of cases)
>44,887
Eradicated
Guineaworm
( no. of cases)
>39,792
Eradicated
Polio
29709
265
Infrastructure
SC/PHC/CHC
725
57,363
1,63,181
(99-RHS)
Dispensaries
&Hospitals( all)
9209
23,555
43,322
(95-96-CBHI)
Beds (Pvt
& Public)
117,198
569,495
8,70,161
(95-96-CBHI)
Doctors(Allopathy)
61,800
2,68,700
5,03,900
(98-99-MCI)
Nursing
Personnel
18,054
1,43,887
7,37,000
(99-INC)
1.4 While noting that the public health
initiatives over the years have contributed significantly
to the improvement of these health indicators, it is
to be acknowledged that public health indicators / disease-burden
statistics are the outcome of several complementary
initiatives under the wider umbrella of the developmental
sector, covering Rural Development, Agriculture, Food
Production, Sanitation, Drinking Water Supply, Education,
etc. Despite the impressive public health gains as revealed
in the statistics in Box-I, there is no gainsaying the
fact that the morbidity and mortality levels in the
country are still unacceptably high. These unsatisfactory
health indices are, in turn, an indication of the limited
success of the public health system in meeting the preventive
and curative requirements of the general population.
1.5 Out of the communicable diseases
which have persisted over time, the incidence of Malaria
staged a resurgence in the1980s before stabilising at
a fairly high prevalence level during the 1990s. Over
the years, an increasing level of insecticide-resistance
has developed in the malarial vectors in many parts
of the country, while the incidence of the more deadly
P-Falciparum Malaria has risen to about 50 percent in
the country as a whole. In respect of TB, the public
health scenario has not shown any significant decline
in the pool of infection amongst the community, and
there has been a distressing trend in the increase of
drug resistance to the type of infection prevailing
in the country. A new and extremely virulent communicable
disease - HIV/AIDS - has emerged on the health scene
since the declaration of the NHP-1983. As there is no
existing therapeutic cure or vaccine for this infection,
the disease constitutes a serious threat, not merely
to public health but to economic development in the
country. The common water-borne infections - Gastroenteritis,
Cholera, and some forms of Hepatitis - continue to contribute
to a high level of morbidity in the population, even
though the mortality rate may have been somewhat moderated.
1.6 The period after the announcement
of NHP-83 has also seen an increase in mortality through
'life-style' diseases- diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular
diseases. The increase in life expectancy has increased
the requirement for geriatric care. Similarly, the increasing
burden of trauma cases is also a significant public
health problem.
1.7 Another area of grave concern
in the public health domain is the persistent incidence
of macro and micro nutrient deficiencies, especially
among women and children. In the vulnerable sub-category
of women and the girl child, this has the multiplier
effect through the birth of low birth weight babies
and serious ramifications of the consequential mental
and physical retarded growth.
1.8 NHP-1983, in a spirit of optimistic
empathy for the health needs of the people, particularly
the poor and under-privileged, had hoped to provide
'Health for All by the year 2000 AD', through the universal
provision of comprehensive primary health care services.
In retrospect, it is observed that the financial resources
and public health administrative capacity which it was
possible to marshal, was far short of that necessary
to achieve such an ambitious and holistic goal. Against
this backdrop, it is felt that it would be appropriate
to pitch NHP-2002 at a level consistent with our realistic
expectations about financial resources, and about the
likely increase in Public Health administrative capacity.
The recommendations of NHP-2002 will, therefore, attempt
to maximize the broad-based availability of health services
to the citizenry of the country on the basis of realistic
considerations of capacity. The changed circumstances
relating to the health sector of the country since 1983
have generated a situation in which it is now necessary
to review the field, and to formulate a new policy framework
as the National Health Policy-2002. NHP-2002 will attempt
to set out a new policy framework for the accelerated
achievement of Public health goals in the socio-economic
circumstances currently prevailing in the country.
2.1.1 The public health investment
in the country over the years has been comparatively
low, and as a percentage of GDP has declined from 1.3
percent in 1990 to 0.9 percent in 1999. The aggregate
expenditure in the Health sector is 5.2 percent of the
GDP. Out of this, about 17 percent of the aggregate
expenditure is public health spending, the balance being
out-of-pocket expenditure. The central budgetary allocation
for health over this period, as a percentage of the
total Central Budget, has been stagnant at 1.3 percent,
while that in the States has declined from 7.0 percent
to 5.5 percent. The current annual per capita public
health expenditure in the country is no more than Rs.
200. Given these statistics, it is no surprise that
the reach and quality of public health services has
been below the desirable standard. Under the constitutional
structure, public health is the responsibility of the
States. In this framework, it has been the expectation
that the principal contribution for the funding of public
health services will be from the resources of the States,
with some supplementary input from Central resources.
In this backdrop, the contribution of Central resources
to the overall public health funding has been limited
to about 15 percent. The fiscal resources of the State
Governments are known to be very inelastic. This is
reflected in the declining percentage of State resources
allocated to the health sector out of the State Budget.
If the decentralized pubic health services in the country
are to improve significantly, there is a need for the
injection of substantial resources into the health sector
from the Central Government Budget. This approach is
a necessity - despite the formal Constitutional provision
in regard to public health, -- if the State public health
services, which are a major component of the initiatives
in the social sector, are not to become entirely moribund.
The NHP-2002 has been formulated taking into consideration
these ground realities in regard to the availability
of resources.
2.2 Equity
2.2.1 In the period when centralized
planning was accepted as a key instrument of development
in the country, the attainment of an equitable regional
distribution was considered one of its major objectives.
Despite this conscious focus in the development process,
the statistics given in Box-II clearly indicate that
the attainment of health indices has been very uneven
across the rural - urban divide.
Box II : Differentials in Health
Status Among States
Sector
Population BPL (%)
IMR/
Per 1000
Live Births (1999-SRS)
<5Mort-ality
per 1000 (NFHS II)
Weight For Age-
% of Children Under 3 years
(<-2SD)
MMR/
Lakh (Annual Report 2000)
Leprosy cases per
10000 popula-tion
Malaria
+ve Cases in year 2000 (in thousands)
India
26.1
70
94.9
47
408
3.7
2200
Rural
27.09
75
103.7
49.6
-
-
-
Urban
23.62
44
63.1
38.4
-
-
-
Better
Performing States
Kerala
12.72
14
18.8
27
87
0.9
5.1
Maharashtra
25.02
48
58.1
50
135
3.1
138
TN
21.12
52
63.3
37
79
4.1
56
Low Performing
States
Orissa
47.15
97
104.4
54
498
7.05
483
Bihar
42.60
63
105.1
54
707
11.83
132
Rajasthan
15.28
81
114.9
51
607
0.8
53
UP
31.15
84
122.5
52
707
4.3
99
MP
37.43
90
137.6
55
498
3.83
528
Also, the statistics bring out the
wide differences between the attainments of health goals
in the better- performing States as compared to the
low-performing States. It is clear that national averages
of health indices hide wide disparities in public health
facilities and health standards in different parts of
the country. Given a situation in which national averages
in respect of most indices are themselves at unacceptably
low levels, the wide inter-State disparity implies that,
for vulnerable sections of society in several States,
access to public health services is nominal and health
standards are grossly inadequate. Despite a thrust in
the NHP-1983 for making good the unmet needs of public
health services by establishing more public health institutions
at a decentralized level, a large gap in facilities
still persists. Applying current norms to the population
projected for the year 2000, it is estimated that the
shortfall in the number of SCs/PHCs/CHCs is of the order
of 16 percent. However, this shortage is as high as
58 percent when disaggregated for CHCs only. The NHP-2002
will need to address itself to making good these deficiencies
so as to narrow the gap between the various States,
as also the gap across the rural-urban divide.
2.2.2 Access to, and benefits from,
the public health system have been very uneven between
the better-endowed and the more vulnerable sections
of society. This is particularly true for women, children
and the socially disadvantaged sections of society.
The statistics given in Box-III highlight the handicap
suffered in the health sector on account of socio-economic
inequity.
Box-III : Differentials in Health
status Among Socio-Economic Groups
Indicator
Infant Mortality/1000
Under 5 Mortality/1000
% Children Underweight
India
70
94.9
47
Social
Inequity
Scheduled
Castes
83
119.3
53.5
Scheduled
Tribes
84.2
126.6
55.9
Other
Disadvantaged
76
103.1
47.3
Others
61.8
82.6
41.1
2.2.3 It is a principal objective
of NHP-2002 to evolve a policy structure which reduces
these inequities and allows the disadvantaged sections
of society a fairer access to public health services.
2.3.1 It is self-evident that in a
country as large as India, which has a wide variety
of socio-economic settings, national health programmes
have to be designed with enough flexibility to permit
the State public health administrations to craft their
own programme package according to their needs. Also,
the implementation of the national health programme
can only be carried out through the State Governments'
decentralized public health machinery. Since, for various
reasons, the responsibility of the Central Government
in funding additional public health services will continue
over a period of time, the role of the Central Government
in designing broad-based public health initiatives will
inevitably continue. Moreover, it has been observed
that the technical and managerial expertise for designing
large-span public health programmes exists with the
Central Government in a considerable degree; this expertise
can be gainfully utilized in designing national health
programmes for implementation in varying socio-economic
settings in the States. With this background, the NHP-2002
attempts to define the role of the Central Government
and the State Governments in the public health sector
of the country.
2.3.2.1 Over the last decade or so,
the Government has relied upon a 'vertical' implementational
structure for the major disease control programmes.
Through this, the system has been able to make a substantial
dent in reducing the burden of specific diseases. However,
such an organizational structure, which requires independent
manpower for each disease programme, is extremely expensive
and difficult to sustain. Over a long time-range, 'vertical'
structures may only be affordable for those diseases
which offer a reasonable possibility of elimination
or eradication in a foreseeable time-span.
2.3.2.2 It is a widespread perception
that, over the last decade and a half, the rural health
staff has become a vertical structure exclusively for
the implementation of family welfare activities. As
a result, for those public health programmes where there
is no separate vertical structure, there is no identifiable
service delivery system at all. The Policy will address
this distortion in the public health system.
2.4 The State of Public Health Infra-Structure
2.4.1 The delineation of NHP-2002
would be required to be based on an objective assessment
of the quality and efficiency of the existing public
health machinery in the field. It would detract from
the quality of the exercise if, while framing a new
policy, it were not acknowledged that the existing public
health infrastructure is far from satisfactory. For
the outdoor medical facilities in existence, funding
is generally insufficient; the presence of medical and
para-medical personnel is often much less than that
required by prescribed norms; the availability of consumables
is frequently negligible; the equipment in many public
hospitals is often obsolescent and unusable; and, the
buildings are in a dilapidated state. In the indoor
treatment facilities, again, the equipment is often
obsolescent; the availability of essential drugs is
minimal; the capacity of the facilities is grossly inadequate,
which leads to over-crowding, and consequentially to
a steep deterioration in the quality of the services.
As a result of such inadequate public health facilities,
it has been estimated that less than 20 percent of the
population, which seek OPD services, and less than 45
percent of that which seek indoor treatment, avail of
such services in public hospitals. This is despite the
fact that most of these patients do not have the means
to make out-of-pocket payments for private health services
except at the cost of other essential expenditure for
items such as basic nutrition.
2.5 Extending Public Health Services
2.5.1 While there is a general shortage
of medical personnel in the country, this shortfall
is disproportionately impacted on the less-developed
and rural areas. No incentive system attempted so far,
has induced private medical personnel to go to such
areas; and, even in the public health sector, the effort
to deploy medical personnel in such under-served areas,
has usually been a losing battle. In such a situation,
the possibility needs to be examined of entrusting some
limited public health functions to nurses, paramedics
and other personnel from the extended health sector
after imparting adequate training to them.
2.5.2 India has a vast reservoir of
practitioners in the Indian Systems of Medicine and
Homoeopathy, who have undergone formal training in their
own disciplines. The possibility of using such practitioners
in the implementation of State/Central Government public
health programmes, in order to increase the reach of
basic health care in the country, is addressed in the
NHP-2002.
2.6 Role of Local Self-Government Institutions
2.6.1 Some States have adopted a policy
of devolving programmes and funds in the health sector
through different levels of the Panchayati Raj Institutions.
Generally, the experience has been an encouraging one.
The adoption of such an organisational structure has
enabled need-based allocation of resources and closer
supervision through the elected representatives. The
Policy examines the need for a wider adoption of this
mode of delivery of health services, in rural as well
as urban areas, in other parts of the country.
2.7 Norms For Health Care Personnel
2.7.1 It is observed that the deployment
of doctors and nurses, in both public and private institutions,
is ad-hoc and significantly short of the requirement
for minimal standards of patient care. This policy will
make a specific recommendation in regard to this deficiency.
2.8.1 Medical and Dental Colleges
are not evenly spread across various parts of the country.
Apart from the uneven geographical distribution of medical
institutions, the quality of education is highly uneven
and in several instances even sub-standard. It is a
common perception that the syllabus is excessively theoretical,
making it difficult for the fresh graduate to effectively
meet even the primary health care needs of the population.
There is a general reluctance on the part of graduate
doctors to serve in areas distant from their native
place. NHP-2002 will suggest policy initiatives to rectify
the resultant disparities.
2.8.2.1 Certain medical disciplines,
such as molecular biology and gene-manipulation, have
become relevant in the period after the formulation
of the previous National Health Policy. The components
of medical research in recent years have changed radically.
In the foreseeable future such research will rely increasingly
on the new disciplines. It is observed that the current
under-graduate medical syllabus does not cover such
emerging subjects. The Policy will make appropriate
recommendations in respect of such deficiencies.
2.8.2.2 Also, certain speciality disciplines
- Anesthesiology, Radiology and Forensic Medicine -
are currently very scarce, resulting in critical deficiencies
in the package of available public health services.
This Policy will recommend some measures to alleviate
such critical shortages.
2.9 Need for Specialists in 'Public
Health' and 'Family Medicine'
2.9.1 In any developing country with
inadequate availability of health services, the requirement
of expertise in the areas of 'public health' and 'family
medicine' is markedly more than the expertise required
for other clinical specialities. In India, the situation
is that public health expertise is non-existent in the
private health sector, and far short of requirement
in the public health sector. Also, the current curriculum
in the graduate / post-graduate courses is outdated
and unrelated to contemporary community needs. In respect
of 'family medicine', it needs to be noted that the
more talented medical graduates generally seek specialization
in clinical disciplines, while the remaining go into
general practice. While the availability of postgraduate
educational facilities is 50 percent of the total number
of qualifying graduates each year, and can be considered
adequate, the distribution of the disciplines in the
postgraduate training facilities is overwhelmingly in
favour of clinical specializations. NHP-2002 examines
the possible means for ensuring adequate availability
of personnel with specialization in the 'public health'
and 'family medicine' disciplines, to discharge the
public health responsibilities in the country.
2.10 Nursing Personnel
2.10.1 The ratio of nursing personnel
in the country vis-à-vis doctors/beds is very low according
to professionally accepted norms. There is also an acute
shortage of nurses trained in super-speciality disciplines
for deployment in tertiary care facilities. NHP-2002
addresses these problems.
2.11 Use of Generic Drugs and Vaccines
2.11.1 India enjoys a relatively low-cost
health care system because of the widespread availability
of indigenously manufactured generic drugs and vaccines.
There is an apprehension that globalization will lead
to an increase in the costs of drugs, thereby leading
to rising trends in overall health costs. This Policy
recommends measures to ensure the future Health Security
of the country.
2.12 Urban Health
2.12.1.1 In most urban areas, public
health services are very meagre. To the extent that
such services exist, there is no uniform organizational
structure. The urban population in the country is presently
as high as 30 percent and is likely to go up to around
33 percent by 2010. The bulk of the increase is likely
to take place through migration, resulting in slums
without any infrastructure support. Even the meagre
public health services which are available do not percolate
to such unplanned habitations, forcing people to avail
of private health care through out-of-pocket expenditure.
2.12.1.2 The rising vehicle density
in large urban agglomerations has also led to an increased
number of serious accidents requiring treatment in well-equipped
trauma centres. NHP-2002 will address itself to the
need for providing this unserved urban population a
minimum standard of broad-based health care facilities.
2.13 Mental Health
2.13.1 Mental health disorders are
actually much more prevalent than is apparent on the
surface. While such disorders do not contribute significantly
to mortality, they have a serious bearing on the quality
of life of the affected persons and their families.
Sometimes, based on religious faith, mental disorders
are treated as spiritual affliction. This has led to
the establishment of unlicensed mental institutions
as an adjunct to religious institutions where reliance
is placed on faith cure. Serious conditions of mental
disorder require hospitalization and treatment under
trained supervision. Mental health institutions are
woefully deficient in physical infrastructure and trained
manpower. NHP-2002 will address itself to these deficiencies
in the public health sector.
2.14.1 A substantial component of
primary health care consists of initiatives for disseminating
to the citizenry, public health-related information.
IEC initiatives are adopted not only for disseminating
curative guidelines (for the TB, Malaria, Leprosy, Cataract
Blindness Programmes), but also as part of the effort
to bring about a behavioural change to prevent HIV/AIDS
and other life-style diseases. Public health programmes,
particularly, need high visibility at the decentralized
level in order to have an impact. This task is difficult
as 35 percent of our country's population is illiterate.
The present IEC strategy is too fragmented, relies too
heavily on the mass media and does not address the needs
of this segment of the population. It is often felt
that the effectiveness of IEC programmes is difficult
to judge; and consequently it is often asserted that
accountability, in regard to the productive use of such
funds, is doubtful. The Policy, while projecting an
IEC strategy, will fully address the inherent problems
encountered in any IEC programme designed for improving
awareness and bringing about a behavioural change in
the general population.
2.14.2 It is widely accepted that
school and college students are the most impressionable
targets for imparting information relating to the basic
principles of preventive health care. The policy will
attempt to target this group to improve the general
level of awareness in regard to 'health-promoting' behaviour.
2.15 Health Research
2.15.1 Over the years, health research
activity in the country has been very limited. In the
Government sector, such research has been confined to
the research institutions under the Indian Council of
Medical Research, and other institutions funded by the
States/Central Government. Research in the private sector
has assumed some significance only in the last decade.
In our country, where the aggregate annual health expenditure
is of the order of Rs. 80,000 crores, the expenditure
in 1998-99 on research, both public and private sectors,
was only of the order of Rs. 1150 crores. It would be
reasonable to infer that with such low research expenditure,
it is virtually impossible to make any dramatic break-through
within the country, by way of new molecules and vaccines;
also, without a minimal back-up of applied and operational
research, it would be difficult to assess whether the
health expenditure in the country is being incurred
through optimal applications and appropriate public
health strategies. Medical Research in the country needs
to be focused on therapeutic drugs/vaccines for tropical
diseases, which are normally neglected by international
pharmaceutical companies on account of their limited
profitability potential. The thrust will need to be
in the newly-emerging frontier areas of research based
on genetics, genome-based drug and vaccine development,
molecular biology, etc. NHP-2002 will address these
inadequacies and spell out a minimal quantum of expenditure
for the coming decade, looking to the national needs
and the capacity of the research institutions to absorb
the funds.
2.16 Role of The Private Sector
2.16.1 Considering the economic restructuring
under way in the country, and over the globe, in the
last decade, the changing role of the private sector
in providing health care will also have to be addressed
in this Policy. Currently, the contribution of private
health care is principally through independent practitioners.
Also, the private sector contributes significantly to
secondary-level care and some tertiary care. It is a
widespread perception that private health services are
very uneven in quality, sometimes even sub-standard.
Private health services are also perceived to be financially
exploitative, and the observance of professional ethics
is noted only as an exception. With the increasing role
of private health care, the implementation of statutory
regulation, and the monitoring of minimum standards
of diagnostic centres / medical institutions becomes
imperative. The Policy will address the issues regarding
the establishment of a comprehensive information system,
and based on that the establishment of a regulatory
mechanism to ensure the maintaining of adequate standards
by diagnostic centres / medical institutions, as well
as the proper conduct of clinical practice and delivery
of medical services.
2.16.2 Currently, non-Governmental
service providers are treating a large number of patients
at the primary level for major diseases. However, the
treatment regimens followed are diverse and not scientifically
optimal, leading to an increase in the incidence of
drug resistance. This policy will address itself to
recommending arrangements which will eliminate the risks
arising from inappropriate treatment.
2.16.3 The increasing spread of information
technology raises the possibility of its adoption in
the health sector. NHP-2002 will examine this possibility.
2.17.1 Historically, it has been the
practice to implement major national disease control
programmes through the public health machinery of the
State/Central Governments. It has become increasingly
apparent that certain components of such programmes
cannot be efficiently implemented merely through government
functionaries. A considerable change in the mode of
implementation has come about in the last two decades,
with the increasing involvement of NGOs and other institutions
of civil society. It is to be recognized that widespread
debate on various public health issues has, in fact,
been initiated and sustained by NGOs and other members
of the civil society. Also, an increasing contribution
is being made by such institutions in the delivery of
different components of public health services. Certain
disease control programmes require close inter-action
with the beneficiaries for regular administration of
drugs; periodic carrying out of pathological tests;
dissemination of information regarding disease control
and other general health information. NHP-2002 will
address such issues and suggest policy instruments for
the implementation of public health programmes through
individuals and institutions of civil society.
2.18 National Disease Surveillance
Network
2.18.1 The technical network available
in the country for disease surveillance is extremely
rudimentary and to the extent that the system exists,
it extends only up to the district level. Disease statistics
are not flowing through an integrated network from the
decentralized public health facilities to the State/Central
Government health administration. Such an arrangement
only provides belated information, which, at best, serves
a limited statistical purpose. The absence of an efficient
disease surveillance network is a major handicap in
providing a prompt and cost-effective health care system.
The efficient disease surveillance network set up for
Polio and HIV/AIDS has demonstrated the enormous value
of such a public health instrument. Real-time information
on focal outbreaks of common communicable diseases -
Malaria, GE, Cholera and JE - and the seasonal trends
of diseases, would enable timely intervention, resulting
in the containment of the thrust of epidemics. In order
to be able to use an integrated disease surveillance
network for operational purposes, real-time information
is necessary at all levels of the health administration.
The Policy would address itself to this major systemic
shortcoming in the administration.
2.19 Health Statistics
2.19.1 The absence of a systematic
and scientific health statistics data-base is a major
deficiency in the current scenario. The health statistics
collected are not the product of a rigorous methodology.
Statistics available from different parts of the country,
in respect of major diseases, are often not obtained
in a manner which make aggregation possible or meaningful.
2.19.2.1 Further, the absence of proper
and systematic documentation of the various financial
resources used in the health sector is another lacuna
in the existing health information scenario. This makes
it difficult to understand trends and levels of health
spending by private and public providers of health care
in the country, and, consequently, to address related
policy issues and to formulate future investment policies.
2.19.2.2 NHP-2002 will address itself
to the programme for putting in place a modern and scientific
health statistics database as well as a system of national
health accounts.
2.20 Women's Health
2.20.1 Social, cultural and economic
factors continue to inhibit women from gaining adequate
access even to the existing public health facilities.
This handicap does not merely affect women as individuals;
it also has an adverse impact on the health, general
well-being and development of the entire family, particularly
children. This policy recognises the catalytic role
of empowered women in improving the overall health standards
of the community.
2.21 Medical Ethics
2.21.1 Professional medical ethics
in the health sector is an area which has not received
much attention. Professional practices are perceived
to be grossly commercial and the medical profession
has lost its elevated position as a provider of basic
services to fellow human beings. In the past, medical
research has been conducted within the ethical guidelines
notified by the Indian Council of Medical Research.
The first document containing these guidelines was released
in 1960, and was comprehensively revised in 2001. With
the rapid developments in the approach to medical research,
a periodic revision will no doubt be more frequently
required in future. Also, the new frontier areas of
research - involving gene manipulation, organ/human
cloning and stem cell research _ impinge on visceral
issues relating to the sanctity of human life and the
moral dilemma of human intervention in the designing
of life forms. Besides this, in the emerging areas of
research, there is the uncharted risk of creating new
life forms, which may irreversibly damage the environment
as it exists today. NHP - 2002 recognises that this
moral and religious dilemma, which was not relevant
even two years ago, now pervades mainstream health sector
issues.
2.22 Enforcement of Quality Standards
for Food and Drugs
2.22.1 There is an increasing expectation
and need of the citizenry for efficient enforcement
of reasonable quality standards for food and drugs.
Recognizing this, the Policy will make an appropriate
policy recommendation on this issue.
2.23 Regulation of Standards in Para
Medical Disciplines
2.23.1 It has been observed that a
large number of training institutions have mushroomed,
particularly in the private sector, for para medical
personnel with various skills - Lab Technicians, Radio
Diagnosis Technicians, Physiotherapists, etc. Currently,
there is no regulation/monitoring, either of the curriculae
of these institutions, or of the performance of the
practitioners in these disciplines. This Policy will
make recommendations to ensure the standardization of
such training and the monitoring of actual performance.
2.24.1 The ambient environmental conditions
are a significant determinant of the health risks to
which a community is exposed. Unsafe drinking water,
unhygienic sanitation and air pollution significantly
contribute to the burden of disease, particularly in
urban settings. The initiatives in respect of these
environmental factors are conventionally undertaken
by the participants, whether private or public, in the
other development sectors. In this backdrop, the Policy
initiatives, and the efficient implementation of the
linked programmes in the health sector, would succeed
only to the extent that they are complemented by appropriate
policies and programmes in the other environment-related
sectors.
2.24.2 Work conditions in several
sectors of employment in the country are sub-standard.
As a result, workers engaged in such employment become
particularly vulnerable to occupation-linked ailments.
The long-term risk of chronic morbidity is particularly
marked in the case of child labour. NHP-2002 will address
the risk faced by this particularly vulnerable section
of society.
2.25 Providing Medical Facilities to
Users From Overseas
2.25.1 The secondary and tertiary
facilities available in the country are of good quality
and cost-effective compared to international medical
facilities. This is true not only of facilities in the
allopathic disciplines, but also of those belonging
to the alternative systems of medicine, particularly
Ayurveda. The Policy will assess the possibilities of
encouraging the development of paid treatment-packages
for patients from overseas.
2.26 The Impact of Globalization on
The Health Sector
2.26.1 There are some apprehensions
about the possible adverse impact of economic globalisation
on the health sector. Pharmaceutical drugs and other
health services have always been available in the country
at extremely inexpensive prices. India has established
a reputation around the globe for the innovative development
of original process patents for the manufacture of a
wide-range of drugs and vaccines within the ambit of
the existing patent laws. With the adoption of Trade
Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), and the
subsequent alignment of domestic patent laws consistent
with the commitments under TRIPS, there will be a significant
shift in the scope of the parameters regulating the
manufacture of new drugs/vaccines. Global experience
has shown that the introduction of a TRIPS-consistent
patent regime for drugs in a developing country results
in an across-the-board increase in the cost of drugs
and medical services. NHP-2002 will address itself to
the future imperatives of health security in the country,
in the post-TRIPS era.
2.27 Inter-Sectoral Contribution to
Health
2.27.1 It is well recognized that
the overall well-being of the citizenry depends on the
synergistic functioning of the various sectors in the
socio-economy. The health status of the citizenry would,
inter alia, be dependent on adequate nutrition, safe
drinking water, basic sanitation, a clean environment
and primary education, especially for the girl child.
The policies and the mode of functioning in these independent
areas would necessarily overlap each other to contribute
to the health status of the community. From the policy
perspective, it is therefore imperative that the independent
policies of each of these inter-connected sectors, be
in tandem, and that the interface between the policies
of the two connected sectors, be smooth.
2.27.2 Sectoral policy documents are
meant to serve as a guide to action for institutions
and individual participants operating in that sector.
Consistent with this role, NHP-2002 limits itself to
making recommendations for the participants operating
within the health sector. The policy aspects relating
to inter-connected sectors, which, while crucial, fall
outside the domain of the health sector, will not be
covered by specific recommendations in this Policy document.
Needless to say, the future attainment of the various
goals set out in this policy assumes a reasonable complementary
performance in these inter-connected sectors.
2.28 Population Growth and Health Standards
2.28.1 Efforts made over the years
for improving health standards have been partially neutralized
by the rapid growth of the population. It is well recognized
that population stabilization measures and general health
initiatives, when effectively synchronized, synergistically
maximize the socio-economic well-being of the people.
Government has separately announced the `National Population
Policy - 2000'. The principal common features covered
under the National Population Policy-2000 and NHP-2002,
relate to the prevention and control of communicable
diseases; giving priority to the containment of HIV/AIDS
infection; the universal immunization of children against
all major preventable diseases; addressing the unmet
needs for basic and reproductive health services, and
supplementation of infrastructure. The synchronized
implementation of these two Policies - National Population
Policy - 2000 and National Health Policy-2002 - will
be the very cornerstone of any national structural plan
to improve the health standards in the country.
2.29 Alternative Systems of Medicine
2.29.1 Under the overarching umbrella
of the national health frame work, the alternative systems
of medicine - Ayurveda, Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy
- have a substantial role. Because of inherent advantages,
such as diversity, modest cost, low level of technological
input and the growing popularity of natural plant-based
products, these systems are attractive, particularly
in the underserved, remote and tribal areas. The alternative
systems will draw upon the substantial untapped potential
of India as one of the eight important global centers
for plant diversity in medicinal and aromatic plants.
The Policy focuses on building up credibility for the
alternative systems, by encouraging evidence-based research
to determine their efficacy, safety and dosage, and
also encourages certification and quality-marking of
products to enable a wider popular acceptance of these
systems of medicine. The Policy also envisages the consolidation
of documentary knowledge contained in these systems
to protect it against attack from foreign commercial
entities by way of malafide action under patent laws
in other countries. The main components of NHP-2002
apply equally to the alternative systems of medicines.
However, the Policy features specific to the alternative
systems of medicine will be presented as a separate
document.
Objectives
3.1 The main objective of this policy
is to achieve an acceptable standard of good health
amongst the general population of the country. The approach
would be to increase access to the decentralized public
health system by establishing new infrastructure in
deficient areas, and by upgrading the infrastructure
in the existing institutions. Overriding importance
would be given to ensuring a more equitable access to
health services across the social and geographical expanse
of the country. Emphasis will be given to increasing
the aggregate public health investment through a substantially
increased contribution by the Central Government. It
is expected that this initiative will strengthen the
capacity of the public health administration at the
State level to render effective service delivery. The
contribution of the private sector in providing health
services would be much enhanced, particularly for the
population group which can afford to pay for services.
Primacy will be given to preventive and first-line curative
initiatives at the primary health level through increased
sectoral share of allocation. Emphasis will be laid
on rational use of drugs within the allopathic system.
Increased access to tried and tested systems of traditional
medicine will be ensured. Within these broad objectives,
NHP-2002 will endeavour to achieve the time-bound goals
mentioned in Box-IV.
Box-IV: Goals to be achieved by
2000-2015
Eradicate Polio and Yaws
2005
Eliminate Leprosy
2005
Eliminate Kala Azar
2010
Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis
2015
Achieve Zero level growth of
HIV/AIDS
2007
Reduce Mortality by 50% on account
of TB, Malaria and Other Vector and Water Borne
diseases
2010
Reduce Prevalence of Blindness
to 0.5%
2010
Reduce IMR to 30/1000 And MMR
to 100/Lakh
2010
Increase utilization of public
health facilities from current Level of <20
to >75%
2010
Establish an integrated system
of surveillance, National Health Accounts and
Health Statistics.
2005
Increase health expenditure
by Government as a % of GDP from the existing
0.9 % to 2.0%
2010
Increase share of Central grants
to Constitute at least 25% of total health spending
2010
Increase State Sector Health
spending from 5.5% to 7% of the budget
4.1.1 The paucity of public health
investment is a stark reality. Given the extremely difficult
fiscal position of the State Governments, the Central
Government will have to play a key role in augmenting
public health investments. Taking into account the gap
in health care facilities, it is planned, under the
policy to increase health sector expenditure to 6 percent
of GDP, with 2 percent of GDP being contributed as public
health investment, by the year 2010. The State Governments
would also need to increase the commitment to the health
sector. In the first phase, by 2005, they would be expected
to increase the commitment of their resources to 7 percent
of the Budget; and, in the second phase, by 2010, to
increase it to 8 percent of the Budget. With the stepping
up of the public health investment, the Central Government's
contribution would rise to 25 percent from the existing
15 percent by 2010. The provisioning of higher public
health investments will also be contingent upon the
increase in the absorptive capacity of the public health
administration so as to utilize the funds gainfully.
4.2 Equity
4.2.1 To meet the objective of reducing
various types of inequities and imbalances - inter-regional;
across the rural - urban divide; and between economic
classes - the most cost-effective method would be to
increase the sectoral outlay in the primary health sector.
Such outlets afford access to a vast number of individuals,
and also facilitate preventive and early stage curative
initiative, which are cost effective. In recognition
of this public health principle, NHP-2002 sets out an
increased allocation of 55 percent of the total public
health investment for the primary health sector; the
secondary and tertiary health sectors being targeted
for 35 percent and 10 percent respectively. The Policy
projects that the increased aggregate outlays for the
primary health sector will be utilized for strengthening
existing facilities and opening additional public health
service outlets, consistent with the norms for such
facilities.
4.3 Delivery of National Public Health
Programmes
4.3.1.1 This policy envisages a key
role for the Central Government in designing national
programmes with the active participation of the State
Governments. Also, the Policy ensures the provisioning
of financial resources, in addition to technical support,
monitoring and evaluation at the national level by the
Centre. However, to optimize the utilization of the
public health infrastructure at the primary level, NHP-2002
envisages the gradual convergence of all health programmes
under a single field administration. Vertical programmes
for control of major diseases like TB, Malaria, HIV/AIDS,
as also the RCH and Universal Immunization Programmes,
would need to be continued till moderate levels of prevalence
are reached. The integration of the programmes will
bring about a desirable optimisation of outcomes through
a convergence of all public health inputs. The Policy
also envisages that programme implementation be effected
through autonomous bodies at State and district levels.
The interventions of State Health Departments may be
limited to the overall monitoring of the achievement
of programme targets and other technical aspects. The
relative distancing of the programme implementation
from the State Health Departments will give the project
team greater operational flexibility. Also, the presence
of State Government officials, social activists, private
health professionals and MLAs/MPs on the management
boards of the autonomous bodies will facilitate well-informed
decision-making.
4.3.1.2 The Policy also highlights
the need for developing the capacity within the State
Public Health administration for scientific designing
of public health projects, suited to the local situation.
4.3.2 The Policy envisages that apart
from the exclusive staff in a vertical structure for
the disease control programmes, all rural health staff
should be available for the entire gamut of public health
activities at the decentralized level, irrespective
of whether these activities relate to national programmes
or other public health initiatives. It would be for
the Head of the District Health administration to allocate
the time of the rural health staff between the various
programmes, depending on the local need. NHP-2002 recognizes
that to implement such a change, n